From: Robert G. <rpg...@si...> - 2010-12-27 19:25:56
|
On 12/27/10 Dec 27 -1:17 PM, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote: > [Robert Goldman <rpg...@si...> (2010-12-27 17:14:55 UTC)] > >> 1. Would it be reasonable to change the call marked with "+" to: >> >> (compiler-style-warn >> "Declaring variable ~S to be ignored, but not in the form which >> defines this variable." >> name) > > No, because it seems to imply that the variable is defined elsewhere, > which it might not be. I suggest something along the lines of > > "Declaring variable ~S, not bound in this form, to be ignored" > > (I have no idea about your other question.) Quite right. That is a much more clear message. best, r |