From: Jim W. <jw...@dr...> - 2010-08-24 15:27:11
|
Zach Beane <xa...@xa...> writes: > Jim Wise <jw...@dr...> writes: > >> ...there's more extensive asdf 2 support in the upstream asdf-install >> fixes. > > For what it's what's it's worth, there's no "upstream" for SBCL's > asdf-install - it's the original. The portable asdf-install is a fork > that shares the same name but is otherwise pretty different. Aha -- that makes sense. Thanks, -- Jim Wise jw...@dr... |