From: Alastair B. <ala...@gm...> - 2010-05-02 15:31:46
|
Hello, On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Bruce O'Neel <ec...@pc...> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks very much for all of the PPC patches! That's very nice > and now nicely explains why I was having so many problems with my > programs that used big hash tables. Excellent! Not a problem. I just got a G5 about a fortnight ago, and have been trying to clear up the "obvious" problems that I've run into. Mostly failures in the test-suite, although the GC was fairly obvious as well. Do you have a list of PPC-related problems that could do with looking at? > I also have OpenBSD/PPC working, the patches to 1.0.38.5 are at: > > http://www.pckswarms.ch/sbcl/ppc-openbsd-4.6-patch-20100430.tar.gz I'm afraid that these have two obvious problems: 1. The accepted patch format is a "unified context diff", not replacement files. 2. These changes very obviously break a number of other platforms, such as every non-openbsd gencgc ppc target. And that's just from src/compiler/ppc/parms.lisp. The other changed source files have similar breakages. An additional problem is that I cannot run OpenBSD on my system (it supports neither my hard drive controller nor my network adaptor), so I can't really clean these up myself. > cheers > > bruce -- Alastair Bridgewater |