Re: [Sbcl-devel] How abour top-level setf = REPL-lexical variables?

[Tobias C. R. <tc...@fr...>]

Kevin Reid <kp...@ma...> writes:

> IMO, the best way to make this DWIM (which as far as I know is  
> conformant (in that the REPL is mostly unspecified) but not currently  
> done by any CL implementation) is to make x a *lexical* variable which  
> is managed by the REPL. Your example would then do exactly what you  
> meant.

Allegro does it, I think. (I currently have no opportunity to validate
the claim, though.)

  -T.