From: Nikodemus S. <nik...@ra...> - 2008-07-07 07:59:07
|
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Matthew D. Swank <ak...@ch...> wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 12:05:49 +0300 > "Nikodemus Siivola" <nik...@ra...> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Nikodemus Siivola >> <nik...@ra...> wrote: >> >> > fix it? If it does not, I can provide -- but not test -- a patch >> > that provides different address space layouts for Win32 and Win64. >> >> Something like the attached. (If the one-line change does not work, >> but this does -- and if someone can confirm it works on Win64 as well, >> please do tell. Of course I would like to know if this *doesn't* work >> as well.) > > Both patches seem to work (on win32-- I can't test win64). Thanks for the information. I've committed the one-line change as 1.0.18.13. (The larger patch would have meant that SBCL build on Win64 would not work on Win32 and vice versa.) Cheers, -- Nikodemus |