Re: [Sbcl-devel] ASDF version

[Nikodemus S. <nik...@ra...>]

On 1/31/08, Victor Kryukov <vic...@gm...> wrote:
> I'm currently using SBCL 1.0.13, and it ships with asdf version 1.102
> [1], and the same is true for the development version of SBCL, while
> the most recent version is 1.111[2]. Is it by design? I'm asking
> because 1.107, which is 10 months old, introduced
> system-relative-pathname functionality, which is quite useful.

No, not by any particular design that I am aware of. I'll update the
SBCL copy.

Cheers,

 -- Nikodemus