Re: [Sbcl-devel] bounty scheme and concurrency ideas

[Nathan F. <fr...@gm...>]

On Jan 18, 2008 7:50 PM, Daniel Herring <dhe...@te...> wrote:
> - a "tailcall" special function or a more general
> (stack-smash-call new-function &rest args)

You do realize that SBCL already supports this under the right
optimization settings...?

-Nathan