From: Thiemo S. <th...@ne...> - 2005-08-12 09:47:13
|
R. Mattes wrote: > On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 23:32 +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > Peter Van Eynde wrote: > > [snip] > > > Do people think it is better to have a sbcl that bombs out on 2.4 with > > > "you should run 2.6" or should I drop the threading on x86? > > > > The Debian kernel team pushes strongly for 2.6 only (at least for i386 > > an amd64) and there's currently not much activity for 2.4 updates > > beyond 2.4.27 for sarge. Some architectures may keep 2.4 for a while, > > but for i386/amd64 it is de facto dead. > > Argh, habe mercy with us poor sysadmins. The last thing i need to do > is upgrade all of our servers to 2.6 only to keep sbcl happy :-/ Sarge will still retain 2.4.27 as installed default, only unstable will change, which is hopefully not what you run on your servers. :-) An additional sarge backport of a newer SBCL with threading disabled might be useful. Thiemo |