Re: [Sbcl-devel] Why the TOPLEVEL-restart?

[William H. N. <wil...@ai...>]

On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 05:34:27PM +0200, Nikodemus Siivola wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, William Harold Newman wrote:
> 
> Having a catch tag 'top-level-loop instead of the restart would
> make implementing the command simple, and the invocation could
> be further encapsulated in function SB-EXT:RETURN-TO-TOP-LEVEL;
> best of both worlds sort of thing.
> 
> (Just need to add the catch-tag around the initialization file and
> --eval option processing too.)
> 
> How's that sound?

Fine with me. I have been convinced that getting rid of the prompt
clutter in the common one-level-deep case is a net improvement; I'm
not that picky about the implementation details.

-- 
William Harold Newman <wil...@ai...>
Ubi saeva indignatio ulterius cor lacerare nequit. -- Jonathan Swift's epitaph