From: Daniel B. <da...@te...> - 2004-06-26 17:42:00
|
I have committed my mostly non-functional x86-64 backend work onto the `when-all-you-have-is-a-hammer-branch'. I'm telling you this mostly so that you know what's happening: I'm reaching the point where I'm making changes that I might want to revert, and programming without a version control safety net is frightening. I certainly don't recommend attempting to use this. Please don't even bother having expectations about what it might do: the answer is "get partway through cold init" - /at head of loop over *BUILT-IN-CLASSES* /at head of loop over *BUILT-IN-CLASSES* /at head of loop over *BUILT-IN-CLASSES* /done with loop over *BUILT-IN-CLASSES* /about to define temporary STANDARD-CLASSes /defining temporary STANDARD-CLASS /INHERITS=.. 0x0d2e403f /done defining temporary STANDARD-CLASSes /about to set *BUILT-IN-CLASS-CODES* /done setting *BUILT-IN-CLASS-CODES* !EARLY-TYPE-COLD-INIT !LATE-TYPE-COLD-INIT fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 26497: no handler for signal 11 in interrupt_handle_now(..) Sooner or later it'll want to be forward-ported (the branch point was 0.8.7.25), but there are many things needing to be done first, including sorting out the pretty appalling mess that is floating point. -dan -- "please make sure that the person is your friend before you confirm" |