From: Raymond W. <Ray...@fa...> - 2004-04-17 23:04:05
|
Christophe Rhodes writes: > Raymond Wiker <Ray...@fa...> writes: > > > Another possibility might be that unused variables may have > > been promoted from style-warning to warning recently... I guess this > > is the next thing I could check. > > That's exactly right, yes. I did this (only during cross-compilation, > not in the final executable) and was mildly surprised to find that it > flushed out a couple of real bugs in the sbcl library. Clearly the > kinds of things that you're finding are less interesting, but I think > it is worth the slight transitional pain. > > If you can add enough IGNORE declarations to get it working again on > ppc (I tested on alpha, x86 and sparc... hey ho) I'll be happy to > apply the patch. Ok, here's a set of patches that enables me to build under MacOSX. #+nil is probably not the right way of "fixing" static-fn.lisp :-) |