From: Christophe R. <cs...@ca...> - 2004-04-17 16:55:00
|
Raymond Wiker <Ray...@fa...> writes: > Another possibility might be that unused variables may have > been promoted from style-warning to warning recently... I guess this > is the next thing I could check. That's exactly right, yes. I did this (only during cross-compilation, not in the final executable) and was mildly surprised to find that it flushed out a couple of real bugs in the sbcl library. Clearly the kinds of things that you're finding are less interesting, but I think it is worth the slight transitional pain. If you can add enough IGNORE declarations to get it working again on ppc (I tested on alpha, x86 and sparc... hey ho) I'll be happy to apply the patch. Cheers, Christophe -- http://www-jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~csr21/ +44 1223 510 299/+44 7729 383 757 (set-pprint-dispatch 'number (lambda (s o) (declare (special b)) (format s b))) (defvar b "~&Just another Lisp hacker~%") (pprint #36rJesusCollegeCambridge) |