Re: [Sbcl-devel] more warnings fixes

[Perry E. M. <pe...@pi...>]

Christophe Rhodes <cs...@ca...> writes:
>> +static inline lispobj *
>> +newspace_alloc(int nwords, int constantp) 
>>  {
>>  [...]
>> -    orig = newspace_alloc(0,constant);
>> +    orig = (lispobj *)newspace_alloc(0,constant);
>>      length = 0;
>
> Given the first portion of this patch, the second is redundant, is it
> not?

orig is not a lispobj * -- it is another kind of pointer -- so the
second part is not redundant. I didn't even notice the need for the
second until I did the first...


-- 
Perry E. Metzger		pe...@pi...