From: William H. N. <wil...@ai...> - 2003-08-31 16:07:38
|
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 12:12:35PM +0100, Daniel Barlow wrote: > Alexey Dejneka <ade...@co...> writes: > > > I've attached a patch for it. Could anybody with a better UNIX > > knowledge take a look at it? > > I haven't tried it, but I see no obvious reason that it shouldn't work. > > I'm not sure I believe it's necessary, though. Is it worth carrying > around this mechanism just to be able to do (unix-kill pid :cont)? > Why not define the signal numbers as ordinary constants and make > people do (unix-kill pid sb-unix:sigcont) ? I agree. (Surprise, surprise.:-) It's an extra way to do something which doesn't seem to add much value, so deleting it seems reasonable. > Note that SB-UNIX is nominally internal-use-only, so the only people > affected are implementors and people who should expect interfaces to > change from under them anyway. There's less than a screenful of > output for grep -i unix-kill across the sbcl source code. -- William Harold Newman <wil...@ai...> Sweeping the stones off the board is also an internationally understood way of resigning.;-) -- Bill Spight, in <http://senseis.xmp.net/?TheArtOfResignation> PGP key fingerprint 85 CE 1C BA 79 8D 51 8C B9 25 FB EE E0 C3 E5 7C |