Re: [Sax-devel] Should I use sax?
Brought to you by:
dmegginson
From: Michael G. <mrg...@ca...> - 2006-05-23 21:15:45
|
Mikael St=E5ldal <mik...@ho...> wrote on 05/23/2006 04:47:36 PM: > Michael Glavassevich wrote: > > If you're writing new code, I would avoid using Xerces' native=20 > > serializers. They are non-standard, not particularly well maintained=20 and=20 > > likely to be deprecated [1] soon (perhaps in the next release). JAXP's = > > TransformerHandler [2] is a much better choice for serializing SAX=20 events. >=20 > The serialization code in JAXP is from Xalan (the XSLT processor). It=20 > has some problems and gives different results in Java 1.4 and 1.5 in=20 > some cases. JAXP is an API. I think you mean the Sun implementation which contains a=20 fork of Apache Xalan. The latest version of Xalan may have fixed some of=20 the bugs you found or never had them to begin with. Thanks. Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: mrg...@ca... E-mail: mrg...@ap... |