Re: [Savonet-users] Buffer overrun

[<fre...@pe...>]

Facundo Suárez <sua...@gm...> a écrit :

> 2011/12/29  <fre...@pe...>:
>> Facundo Suárez <sua...@gm...> a écrit :
>>
>>> 2011/12/29  <fre...@pe...>:
>>>>
>>>> Facundo Suárez <sua...@gm...> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> 2011/12/28 Frédéric <fre...@pe...>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 28/12/2011 17:27, David Baelde a écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 5:08 PM,<fre...@pe...>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My source using "input.http" is defined in my script, even if it is
>>>>>>>> relayed
>>>>>>>> only 1 hour per day (for the news bulletin).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ok so my suspicion was correct. To get rid of the message simply plug
>>>>>>> a dummy output on your HTTP input. It'll empty it and avoid overruns.
>>>>>>> It's costless and practically riskless.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, I've tried to modify my script tonight adding a "output.dummy"
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> the source created by "input.http".
>>>>>> It seems that everything is now correct :)
>>>>>> No more buffer overrun message in my log...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't undersand very well. Can you explain me harder, please !!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If your source is defined somewhere in your script by:
>>>>
>>>> radio = input.harbor(...
>>>>
>>>> add this line later, may be at the end of your script:
>>>>
>>>> output.dummy(fallible=true, radio)
>>>
>>>
>>> Done. I am going to review log later. But just a doubt: after adding
>>> that line you told me, source is still named radio?
>>>
>>
>> You can use whatever you want... but corresponding to the name used in
>> output.dummy parameters
>
> Ok, understood
>
>>
>> What LS Team told us to avoid a buffer overrun, is to create a sink to flush
>> the buffer.
>>
>>
>
> Is it a better solution? Can you explain how to set it up? Please !!
>
> Thanks
>

Sorry but I don't know how being more precise...
Can you copy your current script? I'll try to tell you how to modify it.

Fred