From: Davit B. <ja...@gm...> - 2011-03-10 07:32:21
|
Thank you David! That was it, turned out that I was actually launching harbor in one of my inputs :/ My fault. 8005 port has confused me probably, since I was setting it to 8890 globally and not seeing the change. But will that mean that for every liquidsoap process I will need a separate harbor? Is it possible to interrupt all running processes with single live input? Or I will need to run all channels on single process to achieve that? Davit Barbakadze On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:23 PM, David Baelde <dav...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not the dev behind harbor, so I can't give an in-depth answer, but > I should be able to point in the right direction... > > I just checked on a SVN build that I have running on my server, it's > version r8154 and it doesn't have a 8005 port open. I believe other > versions behave the same. It must be that you have a harbor input > somehow, or perhaps a http service enabled in your liquidsoap > scripts... did you check includes, everything? > > Note that the configuration of harbor changed a bit recently: almost > everything is local to each harbor instance now. No more > set("harbor.port",xxx), use input.harbor(port=xxx,...) instead. > > We'll figure this out! > -- > David > |