"TypeError: xslDoc.load is not a function" in latest version of Firefox
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should add a check for the presence of window.XSLTProcessor: if((!window.XMLSerializer || !window.XSLTProcessor || Sarissa._SARISSA_IS_IE9) && Sarissa.getDomDocument && Sarissa.getDomDocument("","foo", null).xml)
quick search only shows setting onreadystatechange to instances, closing as this seems outdated/invalid
Don't set onreadystatechange on prototypes
fixed in CVS
Add XSLTProcessor workaround for Microsoft Edge
IE9 Beta - Errors from Test case
closing
fixed in CVS
Add Support for IE11
Illegal window.XMLHttpRequest overwriting
fixed in CVS, will only overwrite for IE7 to reset hardcoded MSXML
closing since this is fixed in CVS
XMLSerializer broken in IE9
Hi guys! can you tell me where cai I found the fixed file por IE11? Thanks a lot...
This bug is said to be fixed in a recent update for Microsoft Edge as of September...
Add XSLTProcessor workaround for Microsoft Edge
Could these blog posts perhaps be interesting to you? Granted, it mentions RichFaces...
Could these blog posts perhaps be interesting to you? Granted, it mentions RichFaces...
Hi everyone, First of all, thank you all for this awesome project! I remember having...
Hi everyone, First of all, thank you all for this awesome project! I remember having...
Hi everyone, First of all, thank you all for this awesome project! I remember having...
Hi everyone, First of all, thank you all for this awesome project! I remember having...
Is there chance of this still happening? Occasionally there's a need to work on legacy...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Sarissa does not detect IE11 as IE at all, thus creating objects which cannot be...
I added a simulation to load method (using XMLHttpRequest) on cvs.
tested on IE9,10 11 and committed to cvs. Thanks for your help.
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...
Maybe when defaulting to Sarissa'a implementation of the serialization, we should...