|
From: Amy W. <al...@co...> - 2014-09-30 03:34:03
|
Hi, I've got WGS data for several three-generation pedigees that I need to call variants on. I am also have some data for unrelated samples. There are two ways I'm considering calling variants with samtools: 1. All samples, including the closely related individuals together (N = ~200 samples) 2. Run variant calling separately for each related individual but using the same set of unrelated samples in each case (N =~ 160 samples). Option (2) will take more compute power, but I don't want to bias calling due to the relatedness, so I'm willing to do it. My question is, will samtools be very biased by the relatedness of the samples? I would think that with sufficient numbers of unrelated individuals, it shouldn't matter much, it will likely affect things somewhat, no? Any advice? -Amy |