From: Masao M. <mu...@hi...> - 2005-09-26 18:30:40
|
Hi, On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 22:41:52 +0900 (JST) Kouhei Sutou <ko...@co...> wrote: > Hi, > > In <dc3...@ma...> > "Re: [ruby-gnome2-devel-en] 2.8: gdk (without cairo) and gdk-pixbuf finished" on Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:03:46 +0200, > Guillaume Cottenceau <gco...@gm...> wrote: > > > > I wrote the codes for cairo but I can't test them because I > > > don't have GTK+ 2.8 environment. So I can't commit the > > > attached patch. Sorry... > > > > I will try to test, at latest tomorrow night. > > Thank you! > > > > +#if GTK_CHECK_VERSION(2,8,0) > > > +# ifdef HAVE_RB_CAIRO_H > > > > Does it make sense to have two different tests? AFAIK gtk 2.8 strictly > > requires Cairo, ruby-gnome2 using gtk 2.8 could do the same. > > I want to support the case: GTK+ 2.8 (and Cairo) is > available but rcairo (Ruby bindings for Cairo) is not > available. Agreed. It's better to reduce dependency. -- .:% Masao Mutoh<mu...@hi...> |