From: Albert C. <rub...@ml...> - 2006-04-20 02:00:32
|
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 09:03:16AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 12:28:30AM -0500, Albert Chin wrote: > > > ruby-fltk uses the same compiler used to build ruby. However, if > > fltk was built with a C++ compiler, ruby-fltk should use it in > > extconf.rb, especially if a non-GCC compiler was used. > > I'm not sure I understand. Both FLTK and Ruby-FLTK are written in C++ > so they are *always* built with a C++ compiler. Ruby-FTLK uses a > hack: extconf.rb loads cxx.rb , which goes through the configuration > and replaces gcc for g++ . Do you need something like this to happen > for non-gcc compilers too? We built Ruby 1.8.4 on Solaris with the Sun C compiler. We built FLTK with the Sun C++ compiler. How do we build ruby-fltk with the Sun C++ compiler, not G++? -- albert chin (ch...@th...) |