|
From: Paul D. <pa...@sn...> - 2003-05-30 18:52:41
|
At 19:24 +0200 5/30/03, Michael Neumann wrote: >On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 07:21:19AM -0500, Paul DuBois wrote: >> At 12:13 +0200 5/30/03, Michael Neumann wrote: >> >Hi, >> > >> >What do you think? >> >For me it seems natural to use the local timezone instead of GMT. >> >> Stefano's right that datetime values in MySQL have no timezone >> information. >> >> But the time returned is in the *server's* local timezone. > >So, if we don't know the server's timezone, the best we could do is to >assume GMT (this at least would be determinant). Of course this >behaviour should be documented somewhere. > >Would you agree? I agree, but I wasn't clear on why there was any problem with using Time.gm in the first place. How does that manifest itself as incorrect behavior? > > >Regards, > > Michael |