Re: Encrypting / Decrypting with file name encryption

[Shachar S. <rsy...@sh...>]

Gerald Boersma wrote:

>Shachar:
>  
>
>Yup, it is part of the standard gzip. That was a waste of time...
>  
>
Glad to be of service :-)

>>This means you could have just done "apt-get
>>install rsyncrypto"... :-)
>>    
>>
>
>Version 0.13.
>
So long as you did not waste time twice... :-)

> I really wanted the filename encryption, so I built 0.16
>myself.
>  
>
Good practice, as I'll probably want you to test the fix before I
release a new rsyncrypto.

>BTW, I have also built and patched argtable. If I specify rsyncrypto
>with no options, I still get a segfault.
>
I know. It's due to the fact that with no proper argument checking,
rsyncrypto then tries to use an empty private key, which causes openssl
to segfault. The exception based error handling was introduced after
that code was written, and with so many fundemental features still
missing, I never got around to fixing it. To me, making sure that
rsyncrypto works when all arguments are correct is so much more
important than making rsyncrypto detect user errors that some things got
pushed aside. Sorry.

> As long as I specify an option,
>(e.g. --help), I no longer get the fault.
>  
>
You can also use the newer version of argtable. I have not gotten around
to creating a deb for it (if you're reading this, Steward, then at least
know I feel guilty).

>Thanks for your contribution and help. Much appreciated.
>  
>
Thanks. It's great to know you do something that people find useful.

>Cheers,
>Gerald
>  
>

-- 
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Consulting ltd.
Have you backed up today's work? http://www.lingnu.com/backup.html