@genodeftest: Did you do a fresh install? Or did you merely overwrite the
existing installation and its folder structure with the content from the zip?
I had done a fresh install (removed old RSSOwl version) before, that's when I
encountered the permission issues mentioned above.
I just tried the latter way: I installed RSSOwl 2.1.0 freshly from the
repository, and than overwrote the installed files with the content of the
2.1.1 zip file. Now I didn't have to correct any permissions, as no new
folders had to be created and the pre-existing folders already had the correct
permissions set. (Though, of course, the package manager "thinks" I still have
RSSOwl 2.1.0 installed.)
Sorry for spamming, just wanted to figure out why there would be
differences...
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I did not delete any application data (in /home/username/.rssowl2/* ) but
renamed the RSSOwl "installation" folder in /opt and "reinstalled" RSSOwl.
The only thing is that I have garanted me full permissions on any file in /opt
because I otherwise RSSOwl could not update itself.
It does not matter if I use openjdk7, openjdk6 or oracle's JDK 7.
btw: my RSSOwl installation uses the built-in xulrunner though 1.9.2.17 is
installed in /usr/lib
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Anonymous
-
2011-07-30
I am uploading a newer version for Linux that changes the XULRunner lookup
logic to:
if system property set, try that
if not, try without property (lookup OS default)
if that fails, use bundled XULRunner
I think this will improve lookup even further. In theory someone might need to
change settings in XULRunner and I guess this would be hard if XULRunner
needed to be modified in the installation directory of RSSOwl which might not
be writeable.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I just upgraded from 2.0x to the 2.1.1 package available from the website (ppa
doesn't offer any newer version, nor a "natty" dist directory...)
The xulrunner problem also occured on my system, however, I fixed it by
renaming the bundled xulrunner directory. So, if your switch logic is already
implemented, it doesn't work as expected ;)
Also, please expand the faq entry a little bit. I had no idea what to do at
this line: "Add a new startup property to rssowl named
-Dorg.eclipse.swt.browser.XULRunnerPath=" I think it's for RSSOwl.ini, but I
needed to google for that. It's not self-explaning.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Anonymous
-
2011-08-07
You should be able to use the getdeb.net repository, its linked from the
download page on rssowl.org.
I updated the FAQ entry to provide more info how to add parameters to RSSOwl.
Its indeed odd that the lookup does not work for you, hm. What exactly happens
when you keep the xulrunner folder and dont rename it?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Anonymous
-
2011-08-07
Actually it would help me a lot if you could do this:
rename the folder back to its original name (xulrunner)
start rssowl and try to open an article
export the log file (from help menu) and send it to me
In 2.1.1 I added some extra logging.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
RSSOwl was unable to create a browser for reading news. Please refer to the
FAQ for further help.
Click 'Ok' to open the FAQ now.
Actually twice, if you hit OK, it opens the help page (http://www.rssowl.org/
help#item_6j) and the popup appears
again. Clicking OK again it opens the page a second time and then rssowl
quits.
Getdeb repo works, I've had http://packages.rssowl.org/ubuntu/
maverick main. Gee, there is a huge number of package updates available right
now...
okay, done updating - rssowl now starts even with the bundled xulrunner.
Articles open without any problems. There must be some difference between the
repo-install and the zipped file..?
(where to put file attachments?)
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Anonymous
-
2011-08-07
packages.rssowl.org is outdated, I should actually consider removing it.
getdeb is maintained. You can post your log to pastebin.ca or send through
mail.
If it works fine now, fair enough. It would still be interesting what kind of
error you get for the zipped file.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Anonymous
-
2011-08-07
Damn, a stupid mistake. RSSOwl is indeed not testing with the OS default
XULRunner, only when a system property is actually set. Oh well, I think this
will make RSSOwl 2.1.2 next weekend end. Thanks for finding :)
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
A couple of days ago, the version of RSSOwl in the GetDeb repository for
Ubuntu 10.04 was updated from RSSOwl 2.1-1~getdeb2 to 2.1.1-1~getdeb1. With
this update, the installation directory was moved from /usr/share/rssowl to
/usr/lib/rssowl. So, assuming you have Ubuntu's XULRunner 1.9.2.18 as system
fallback (so basically, you're still using Firefox 3.6, not FF 4 or 5), you'll
probably have to rename/move the directory /usr/lib/rssowl/xulrunner or RSSOwl
won't start with the error as explained throughout this thread. The GetDeb
version of RSSOwl for 10.04 doesn't seem to work with the bundled XULRunner
version 1.9.2.17 (at least with this constellation of Ubuntu, Firefox and
system default XULRunner versions) – no news there, only a new installation
folder now to troubleshoot.
Hope that helps others with this setup. :-)
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Anonymous
-
2011-08-15
2.1.2 fixes the issue with the lookup, it will:
first check the system property if set
then use the OS default XULRunner
then use the bundled XULRunner
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
D'oh. While digging deep in my systems config I noticed that the bundled
version of xulrunner in the rssowl folder has some flaw:
./xulrunner
run-mozilla.sh: Cannot execute ./xulrunner-bin.
Guess what: Passed chmod +x on xulrunner-bin, and now it is working again...
;)
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Anonymous
-
2011-11-20
hello,
i am having exactly the same problems, although on Fedora 16 - after removing
my old config folder (from ubuntu oneiric, where everything worked flawlessly)
rssowl finally started up, but whenever i click on a feed i still get the
unable to create browser message.
is there any chance to switching to xulrunner 2 anytime soon? 1.9 is terribly
outdated and seems to cause many people problems, especially on 64 bit...
rssowl is a great program and i'd love to continue using it - thanks!
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Anonymous
-
2011-11-20
No plans to switch to XULRunner 1.9, thats out of my control. Eventually
moving to WebKit, but right now I am not planning a new release in the near
future.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Anonymous
-
2011-11-21
I too have been having the "Can't create browser" issue since my upgrade to
Fedora 16. I think I have found the issue, and there is a workaround. It seems
that xulrunner 1.9.2 is assuming there is an OS installation of libhunspell
1.2 where Fedora 16 bundles 1.3. The easy workaround is to grab the F15
package of libhunspell-1.2 and unpack it and place it in the xulrunner
directory for rssowl.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Anonymous
-
2011-11-22
@Marquis42 - thanks for the hint! I tried to do what you suggested but have no
idea how to proceed: how should I unpack the rpm? (putting the libraries
together with the executables into the xulrunner directory doesn't help) I'd
appreciate any help.
@bpasero - thanks for letting me know about your plans, but do you have any
idea how to make rssowl actually work on fedora? atm it seems that the program
is broken on the second most popular distribution. it would be great if we
could make this work. thanks!
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Anonymous
-
2011-11-22
Sorry, atm I can not invest in support. Maybe others can jump in that have
past experiences.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Anonymous
-
2011-11-30
@krzysztof - My apologies, I mistyped that. What I meant to say was that I put
the lib (libhunspell-1.2.so.0) in /usr/lib64. I'm not sure why it wouldn't
haven't worked in the xulrunner directory anyway, but it worked for me in
/usr/lib64.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
This gave me quite a headache on Fedora 16 x86_64 (to which I've upgraded from
Fedora 15 where RSSOwl 2.1.2 worked fine).
The problem is simple, once you get the origin of the problem: download file
is in the zip archive, which looses permissions and xulrunner becomes
unrunnable for ordinary users, so solutions found on the web (point 3 below)
don't work. Here is how I've repaired the problem:
Make xulrunner's executables runnable (for the xulrunner which is bundled with the RSSOwl):
cd <your RSSOwl="" directory="">/xulrunner
chmod 755 $(file /opt/rssowl/xulrunner/ | grep executable | sed 's/:.//')
xulrunner likes to toy with the old libhunspell library, so we have to do the following nasty workaround:
ln -s /usr/lib64/libhunspell-1.3.so.0 /usr/lib64/libhunspell-1.2.so.0
Alternatively, you can get the old version of the libabry itself, as Marquis42
suggested. I am not completely comfortable with that because of the possible
unknown dependencies of the older library. I prefer risking only RSSOwl and
not something more. Anyway, this works for now.
As the user who wants to run RSSOwl, run:
<your RSSOwl="" directory="">/xulrunner/xulrunner --register-user
And that's it (at least it was for me).
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
First, system is Slackware64-current, using RSSOwl Version: 2.1.2, xulrunner
version is 1.9.2.17.
All was working well... until I upgraded KDE to 4.8.1. It was after that I
started having problems (RSSOwl Can't Create a Browser). This was indeed
puzzling, since I did not touch xulrunner.
I followed the FAQ and tried several of the things mention in this tread that
dealt with xulrunner. None of these worked.
As it turned out it has nothing to do with xulrunner. My upgraded of KDE, also
upgraded Hunspell from 1.2.9 to 1.3.2. This turned out to be root cause. As
mentioned above the problem is with libhunspell.
The work-around-fix as mentioned above is to add a symlink pointing
libhunspell-1.2.so.0 to libhunspell-1.3.so.0.0.0:
Yeah, this problem was reported in another thread here around as well. AFAIK
libhunspell 1.2 is a dependency of XULRunner, so we need to bundle a more
recent version of XULRunner…
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
uname -a: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Mar 20 18:36:37 UTC 2012 x86_64
GNU/Linux (Debian Testing)
Thanks to this thread I was able to get a working 64bit RSSOwl install for my
user. I made a script out of vsego's point that the zip did not maintain the
proper file permissions (...):
#!/bin/bash# This script is to chmod +x any executables in the given directory, no matter how nested they are# Making sure a valid directory was passed[[ ! -d "$1"]]&&{echo'Please provide a valid directory!' > /dev/stderr
exit1}# Enabling globstar (the recursive glob)shopt -s globstar
# Setting wordsplittingOIFS="$IFS"# Looping for all executable files in passed directoryIFS=$'\n'for executable in$(file "$1"/** | grep executable | sed 's/:.*//')do# Checking if file isn't actually executable[[ ! -e $file]]&&{# It isnt - fixingecho"Making '$executable' executable..."
chmod +x "$executable"}done# Restoring wordsplittingIFS="$OIFS"
I run RSS owl in a non-standard location as I dont unmanaged non-native
programs polluting my filesystem. Because of this, xulrunner's shared
libraries cant be found, so I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the xulrunner directory
path, e.g. testing with bash in the RSS Owl directory:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./xulrunner/ ./RSSOwl
The next problem was the following (as mentioned by others earlier in the
thread):
./xulrunner-bin: error while loading shared libraries: libhunspell-1.2.so.0:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I couldnt care less about spelling so I locate'd the current version of the
library (1.3) on the system then symlinked it the xulrunner directory under
the name it wants:
OSB board is one of the most-used material sheets in various applications. But what makes it the most preferred construction sheet material by most builders? Continue reading below to find out, including different types of OSB, and where they are commonly used. https://sheetmaterialswholesale.co.uk/sheet-materials/osb/
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Cement shortage has construction industry significantly but MGN Builders Merchants, they supply bagged cement, plasterboard, exceptionally low prices on OSB board 18mm, huge stock levels of bricks and engineering bricks, fascia boards and other building materials. All the products are honestly priced and delivered to customer for free the same day. Chem online at https://www.mgnbm.co.uk/
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Cement shortage has construction industry significantly but MGN Builders Merchants, they supply bagged cement, plasterboard, exceptionally low prices on OSB board 18mm, huge stock levels of bricks and engineering bricks, fascia boards and other building materials. All the products are honestly priced and delivered to customer for free the same day. Chem online at https://www.mgnbm.co.uk/
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
OSB Board is widely used in the construction world wide due to its loadbearing capacity. Did you know why OSB Board is used in building construction apart from other plywood boards? You can Clear your all doubt about OSB Board at One Place and know how many types of OSB Boards are available and also their properties and best Use in Building construction. To know more about OSB Board
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I hope to get more repositories on board in the future, so far getdeb.net
covers Ubuntu.
I have no problems installing 64Bit-version from zip (or tar.gz?) file on
Ubuntu 11.04 64bit. Did not have to change any file permissions.
@genodeftest: Did you do a fresh install? Or did you merely overwrite the
existing installation and its folder structure with the content from the zip?
I had done a fresh install (removed old RSSOwl version) before, that's when I
encountered the permission issues mentioned above.
I just tried the latter way: I installed RSSOwl 2.1.0 freshly from the
repository, and than overwrote the installed files with the content of the
2.1.1 zip file. Now I didn't have to correct any permissions, as no new
folders had to be created and the pre-existing folders already had the correct
permissions set. (Though, of course, the package manager "thinks" I still have
RSSOwl 2.1.0 installed.)
Sorry for spamming, just wanted to figure out why there would be
differences...
I did not delete any application data (in /home/username/.rssowl2/* ) but
renamed the RSSOwl "installation" folder in /opt and "reinstalled" RSSOwl.
The only thing is that I have garanted me full permissions on any file in /opt
because I otherwise RSSOwl could not update itself.
It does not matter if I use openjdk7, openjdk6 or oracle's JDK 7.
btw: my RSSOwl installation uses the built-in xulrunner though 1.9.2.17 is
installed in /usr/lib
I am uploading a newer version for Linux that changes the XULRunner lookup
logic to:
I think this will improve lookup even further. In theory someone might need to
change settings in XULRunner and I guess this would be hard if XULRunner
needed to be modified in the installation directory of RSSOwl which might not
be writeable.
I just upgraded from 2.0x to the 2.1.1 package available from the website (ppa
doesn't offer any newer version, nor a "natty" dist directory...)
The xulrunner problem also occured on my system, however, I fixed it by
renaming the bundled xulrunner directory. So, if your switch logic is already
implemented, it doesn't work as expected ;)
Also, please expand the faq entry a little bit. I had no idea what to do at
this line: "Add a new startup property to rssowl named
-Dorg.eclipse.swt.browser.XULRunnerPath=" I think it's for RSSOwl.ini, but I
needed to google for that. It's not self-explaning.
You should be able to use the getdeb.net repository, its linked from the
download page on rssowl.org.
I updated the FAQ entry to provide more info how to add parameters to RSSOwl.
Its indeed odd that the lookup does not work for you, hm. What exactly happens
when you keep the xulrunner folder and dont rename it?
Actually it would help me a lot if you could do this:
In 2.1.1 I added some extra logging.
Well, the following popup appears on startup:
Click 'Ok' to open the FAQ now.
Actually twice, if you hit OK, it opens the help page (http://www.rssowl.org/
help#item_6j) and the popup appears
again. Clicking OK again it opens the page a second time and then rssowl
quits.
Getdeb repo works, I've had
http://packages.rssowl.org/ubuntu/
maverick main. Gee, there is a huge number of package updates available right
now...
okay, done updating - rssowl now starts even with the bundled xulrunner.
Articles open without any problems. There must be some difference between the
repo-install and the zipped file..?
(where to put file attachments?)
packages.rssowl.org is outdated, I should actually consider removing it.
getdeb is maintained. You can post your log to pastebin.ca or send through
mail.
If it works fine now, fair enough. It would still be interesting what kind of
error you get for the zipped file.
Yep, that's a clever idea ;)
Todays log is here: http://pastebin.de/18142
Damn, a stupid mistake. RSSOwl is indeed not testing with the OS default
XULRunner, only when a system property is actually set. Oh well, I think this
will make RSSOwl 2.1.2 next weekend end. Thanks for finding :)
A couple of days ago, the version of RSSOwl in the GetDeb repository for
Ubuntu 10.04 was updated from RSSOwl 2.1-1~getdeb2 to 2.1.1-1~getdeb1. With
this update, the installation directory was moved from /usr/share/rssowl to
/usr/lib/rssowl. So, assuming you have Ubuntu's XULRunner 1.9.2.18 as system
fallback (so basically, you're still using Firefox 3.6, not FF 4 or 5), you'll
probably have to rename/move the directory /usr/lib/rssowl/xulrunner or RSSOwl
won't start with the error as explained throughout this thread. The GetDeb
version of RSSOwl for 10.04 doesn't seem to work with the bundled XULRunner
version 1.9.2.17 (at least with this constellation of Ubuntu, Firefox and
system default XULRunner versions) – no news there, only a new installation
folder now to troubleshoot.
Hope that helps others with this setup. :-)
2.1.2 fixes the issue with the lookup, it will:
Hi,
same problem again after upgrading to Kubuntu Oneiric Beta... ;)
Log is here -> http://pastebin.de/18992
First start without separate settings, second start with additional
"-Dorg.eclipse.swt.browser.XULRunnerPath=/usr/lib/rssowl/xulrunner/" in
RSSOwl.ini
D'oh. While digging deep in my systems config I noticed that the bundled
version of xulrunner in the rssowl folder has some flaw:
./xulrunner
run-mozilla.sh: Cannot execute ./xulrunner-bin.
Guess what: Passed chmod +x on xulrunner-bin, and now it is working again...
;)
hello,
i am having exactly the same problems, although on Fedora 16 - after removing
my old config folder (from ubuntu oneiric, where everything worked flawlessly)
rssowl finally started up, but whenever i click on a feed i still get the
unable to create browser message.
log output here: http://pastebin.com/XqN6vt4d
is there any chance to switching to xulrunner 2 anytime soon? 1.9 is terribly
outdated and seems to cause many people problems, especially on 64 bit...
rssowl is a great program and i'd love to continue using it - thanks!
No plans to switch to XULRunner 1.9, thats out of my control. Eventually
moving to WebKit, but right now I am not planning a new release in the near
future.
I too have been having the "Can't create browser" issue since my upgrade to
Fedora 16. I think I have found the issue, and there is a workaround. It seems
that xulrunner 1.9.2 is assuming there is an OS installation of libhunspell
1.2 where Fedora 16 bundles 1.3. The easy workaround is to grab the F15
package of libhunspell-1.2 and unpack it and place it in the xulrunner
directory for rssowl.
@Marquis42 - thanks for the hint! I tried to do what you suggested but have no
idea how to proceed: how should I unpack the rpm? (putting the libraries
together with the executables into the xulrunner directory doesn't help) I'd
appreciate any help.
@bpasero - thanks for letting me know about your plans, but do you have any
idea how to make rssowl actually work on fedora? atm it seems that the program
is broken on the second most popular distribution. it would be great if we
could make this work. thanks!
Sorry, atm I can not invest in support. Maybe others can jump in that have
past experiences.
@krzysztof - My apologies, I mistyped that. What I meant to say was that I put
the lib (libhunspell-1.2.so.0) in /usr/lib64. I'm not sure why it wouldn't
haven't worked in the xulrunner directory anyway, but it worked for me in
/usr/lib64.
This gave me quite a headache on Fedora 16 x86_64 (to which I've upgraded from
Fedora 15 where RSSOwl 2.1.2 worked fine).
The problem is simple, once you get the origin of the problem: download file
is in the zip archive, which looses permissions and xulrunner becomes
unrunnable for ordinary users, so solutions found on the web (point 3 below)
don't work. Here is how I've repaired the problem:
cd <your RSSOwl="" directory="">/xulrunner
chmod 755 $(file /opt/rssowl/xulrunner/ | grep executable | sed 's/:.//')
ln -s /usr/lib64/libhunspell-1.3.so.0 /usr/lib64/libhunspell-1.2.so.0
Alternatively, you can get the old version of the libabry itself, as Marquis42
suggested. I am not completely comfortable with that because of the possible
unknown dependencies of the older library. I prefer risking only RSSOwl and
not something more. Anyway, this works for now.
<your RSSOwl="" directory="">/xulrunner/xulrunner --register-user
And that's it (at least it was for me).
First, system is Slackware64-current, using RSSOwl Version: 2.1.2, xulrunner
version is 1.9.2.17.
All was working well... until I upgraded KDE to 4.8.1. It was after that I
started having problems (RSSOwl Can't Create a Browser). This was indeed
puzzling, since I did not touch xulrunner.
I followed the FAQ and tried several of the things mention in this tread that
dealt with xulrunner. None of these worked.
As it turned out it has nothing to do with xulrunner. My upgraded of KDE, also
upgraded Hunspell from 1.2.9 to 1.3.2. This turned out to be root cause. As
mentioned above the problem is with libhunspell.
The work-around-fix as mentioned above is to add a symlink pointing
libhunspell-1.2.so.0 to libhunspell-1.3.so.0.0.0:
ln -s /usr/lib64/libhunspell-1.3.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib64/libhunspell-1.2.so.0
Yeah, this problem was reported in another thread here around as well. AFAIK
libhunspell 1.2 is a dependency of XULRunner, so we need to bundle a more
recent version of XULRunner…
I don't think it's xulrunner. First my xulrunner was compiled with HunSpell
1.2.9, recompiling with 1.3.2 does not fix the problem for me.
Before recompiling xulrunner tried starting RSSOwl with:
RSSOwl -Dorg.eclipse.swt.browser.XULRunnerPath=/usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9.2.17/
RSSOwl is not accepting the command line option. Looking at the About,
Configuration Details, the option is not shown after *** System properties:
Putting it in config.ini after results in:
*** System properties:
-Dorg.eclipse.swt.browser.XULRunnerPath=/usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9.2.17/
Yet the is the XULRunnerPath:
org.eclipse.swt.browser.XULRunnerPath=/usr/lib64/RSSOwl/xulrunner
Nothing I do will get RSSOwl to recognize the /usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9.2.17/
path
Renaming /usr/lib64/RSSOwl/xulrunner/ simply breaks RSSOwl and give me the
can't create browser dialog.
The only thing that works is creating a symlink.
Did you try adding
-Dorg.eclipse.swt.browser.XULRunnerPath=/usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9.2.17/
to rssowl.ini file?
Yes. Read my last post.
uname -a: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Mar 20 18:36:37 UTC 2012 x86_64
GNU/Linux (Debian Testing)
Thanks to this thread I was able to get a working 64bit RSSOwl install for my
user. I made a script out of vsego's point that the zip did not maintain the
proper file permissions (...):
I run RSS owl in a non-standard location as I dont unmanaged non-native
programs polluting my filesystem. Because of this, xulrunner's shared
libraries cant be found, so I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the xulrunner directory
path, e.g. testing with bash in the RSS Owl directory:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./xulrunner/ ./RSSOwl
The next problem was the following (as mentioned by others earlier in the
thread):
./xulrunner-bin: error while loading shared libraries: libhunspell-1.2.so.0:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I couldnt care less about spelling so I locate'd the current version of the
library (1.3) on the system then symlinked it the xulrunner directory under
the name it wants:
ln -s /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhunspell-1.3.so.0 ./libhunspell-1.2.so.0
Ran RSSOwl again and it finally worked.... hopefully the spelling library's
interface didnt change much between the two versions ;)
I was almost going to move to Liferea over this mess.... thanks to this thread
I worked it out just in time.
Fixed same problem on Ubuntu 12.10.
Two issues to work-around
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The LD_LIBRARY_PATH for the xulrunner installed in RSSOWL
It then complains about a problem with xulrunner requiring libhunspell
Now it works! when I run
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./xulrunner/ ./RSSOwl
OSB board is one of the most-used material sheets in various applications. But what makes it the most preferred construction sheet material by most builders? Continue reading below to find out, including different types of OSB, and where they are commonly used. https://sheetmaterialswholesale.co.uk/sheet-materials/osb/
Cement shortage has construction industry significantly but MGN Builders Merchants, they supply bagged cement, plasterboard, exceptionally low prices on OSB board 18mm, huge stock levels of bricks and engineering bricks, fascia boards and other building materials. All the products are honestly priced and delivered to customer for free the same day. Chem online at https://www.mgnbm.co.uk/
Cement shortage has construction industry significantly but MGN Builders Merchants, they supply bagged cement, plasterboard, exceptionally low prices on OSB board 18mm, huge stock levels of bricks and engineering bricks, fascia boards and other building materials. All the products are honestly priced and delivered to customer for free the same day. Chem online at https://www.mgnbm.co.uk/
OSB Board is widely used in the construction world wide due to its loadbearing capacity. Did you know why OSB Board is used in building construction apart from other plywood boards? You can Clear your all doubt about OSB Board at One Place and know how many types of OSB Boards are available and also their properties and best Use in Building construction. To know more about OSB Board