From: Arnaud C. <ar...@ca...> - 2002-05-07 15:33:05
|
Le 07-May-2002, Thomas Leonard a =E9crit :=20 > I'm not sure a tree is very useful, either. Filer windows tend to be > quite small and trees like lots of space. Eg, if you're 6 levels deep, > with only the ancestor nodes expanded (ie, the smallest possible set > of visible nodes) and, say, 10 items per directory (very conservative!)= , > that's a minimum of 60 items! Hi I'm not sure to well understand your explaination... I think about an entire filer window showing the tree OR the objects inside a dir would be simplier. That way, one could open a tree filer window that could be arranged on th= e left by the WM, and it would be simple to middle-click on any dir to open new "ordinary" filer windows to use drag & drop with them... Do you understand what I'm trying to explain ? Or if you want to display the tree in the same window, how 10 items of 6 levels of dirs could be displayed at the same time ? The items displayed would only be those from the directory selected in the tree ! (I agree that it would probably be necessary to use panes, to manage differently the tree & the items parts... --=20 http://www.calvo-france.com (07/03/02) Un desktop puissant ET l=E9ger < http://rox.sourceforge.net > ________________________________________________ A r n a u d C a l v o 47=B043'60N 0=B031'0W |