Re: [rox-users] xf86, gtk+ updates, & ROX-Filer

[Alastair P. <ala...@li...>]

On Sat, 2003-04-05 at 03:34, Keith R. John Warno wrote:
> * Alastair Porter <ala...@li...> [04/04/2003 0416EST]:
> > On Thu, 03 Apr 2003 11:39:10 -0500, Keith R. John Warno wrote
> > 
> > > Anyone have an idea?  gtk+ bug?  As far as I'm aware gtk+ 
> > > 2.2.whatever is supposed to be binary && source compatible w/ 2.0.whatever.
> > 
> > Hmm, same thing happened to me ;-) its basicly the new gtk, you need
> > to rebuild rox against the new libs.
>                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>   Yes, understood.
>   However the question here is "why?". gtk+ 2.2.x and 2.0.x are
>   supposed to be binary and source compatible, so the fact that a
>   rebuild of ROX-Filer is required implies a bug in either ROX-Filer or
>   gtk+.
This was what i was told by my mate who knows a bit more about it that i
do.... i think i still have the log somewhere....:
he said 'probably going to have to recompile rox. the version you are
using was compiled against a different version of GTK2'

Alastair

-- 
(o< - A l a s t a i r   P o r t e r
//\          -- NEW EMAIL --
V_/_   ala...@li...