Re: [rox-devel] Changes of the manual

[Tim W. <tw...@re...>]

On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 06:05:11PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:

> OK, slight apologies.  I was talking about the XML DocBk rather than
> the SGML DocBook, as I didn't think anyone still used SGML these days.
> However, it seems anything but easy to convert to multiple formats
> without installing the kitchen sink, while LaTeX (not TeTeX as I said
> earlier by mistake) works out of the box.

Well, it rather depends on which box you have. :-)  But yes, a full
DocBook installation that can generate PS output tends to include TeX
anyway (DocBook -> TeX -> PS).

Tim.
*/