From: Thomas L. <ta...@gm...> - 2009-04-05 18:52:19
|
2009/4/5 Tony Houghton <h...@re...>: > On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 16:42:35 +0100 > Tony Houghton <h...@re...> wrote: > >> On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 11:12:22 +0100 >> Thomas Leonard <ta...@gm...> wrote: >> >> > There's also an "Appearance 0.9" on the downloads page, which doesn't >> > have this problem, but I'm a bit confused about where this came from: >> >> That would have been the one I uploaded, and I obviously didn't update >> everything properly. I'll compare it with 0.8 and see if there was >> anything else I missed and try to upload a correct version, but I'm >> afraid I don't "do" 0install; is it just a matter of updating >> <http://rox.sourceforge.net/2007/interfaces/Appearance.xml> with the new >> tarball? Yes, but I can do that once it's on the downloads page. > I've uploaded 0.9.1 to the sourceforge uploads area but I don't seem to > have permission to make file releases for Rox. I do still have svn > access so it's available by that route. You should have permission, though they've renamed things a bit: * Project Admin -> Downloads https://sourceforge.net/project/admin/editpackages.php?group_id=7023 * [ Add Release ] Does that work? > BTW did everyone notice git is available on sourceforge now? It might be > a useful alternative to repo.or.cz, but it only supports one repository > per project so you have to use branches for different packages. I guess they'll add multiple repository support sooner or later. It's not much use without it... -- Dr Thomas Leonard ROX desktop / Zero Install GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 |