Menu
▾
▴
Re: [rox-devel] [rox-users] ROX apps/libs and SuSE 11.1/Python 2.6
|
From: Thomas L. <ta...@gm...> - 2009-01-01 21:00:27
|
Keith Hopper: >> OK, hopefully this will fix it: > >> http://repo.or.cz/w/zeroinstall.git?a=commitdiff;h=beb7ee48ccbda784a15f9e9a3f33005020007913;hp=dd74d84d29ac3ce822d6c140154091cd76d43c20 > > I'm not quite sure what this means, but I get a domain not found error > for repo.or.cz either trying to use the URI or 0launch it! Hi Keith, It should show the changes I made (in a browser). $ host repo.or.cz repo.or.cz has address 62.24.64.27 > However, I have been pressing on in slow time with the installation > and found a few more oddities - > > a. Lithium gets a 404 error from www.hayber.us - and from a mirror. All the hayber.us stuff has disappeared. The packages have moved to here: http://code.google.com/u/khayber/ but I'm not sure where the feeds have gone. If someone can find them and republish them at a new location, I'll update ROX-All. Otherwise, I'll remove them. > b. Pager gets a C-Lib not found error (from libdir ??) whereas > 'whereis' finds it. However a further error shows up requiring > libglitz. Should this be a dependency? Is this the reason C-Lib is not > found? Stephen? The libglitz dependency could be removed by recompiling ROX-CLib. Removing the support for multiple platform in one ROX-CLib would make things simpler, since the .so files would be in a fixed location and we wouldn't need to run a script to find them. > c. 0launch-gui/compile is also using the deprecated (by Python 2.6) > popen2 module. Fixed in the GIT version. > d. When attempting to run System there is a python backtrace > indicating an attempt at "double free or corruption (!prev): > 0x08391838 ***" which is glibc detected. I don't know whether this is > related to any of the above or to Python 2.6 itself or whether I > should contact Stephen directly. Don't know about that one :-/ -- Dr Thomas Leonard ROX desktop / Zero Install GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 |