From: Mark W. <mar...@nt...> - 2008-07-29 20:31:35
|
Tony Houghton wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:35:03 +0100 > Mark Williams <mar...@nt...> wrote: > >> Tony Houghton wrote: >>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:30:17 +0100 >>> Mark Williams <mar...@nt...> wrote: >>> >>>> I wasn't sure how much of this would be relevant. So here's the >>>> entirety of the remainder of the .xsession script >>>> >>>> if [ -x "`which 0launch`" ]; then >>>> exec $DBUS_LAUNCH 0launch >>>> http://rox.sourceforge.net/2005/interfaces/ROX-Session -w >>>> fi >>> I don't know why 0launch apparently hasn't honoured the --feed >>> command, but if you comment/delete those lines the ones below >>> should run 0.40 for you. >>> >>>> if [ -x "/home/mark/rox-session-0.40.0/AppRun" ]; then >>>> exec $DBUS_LAUNCH "/home/mark/rox-session-0.40.0/AppRun" -w >>>> fi >> Did that. Should I get rid of the original rox-session too? >> >> Because with it still hanging around I still get the same result. > > I didn't make it clear which lines to delete/comment. I meant get rid of > the ones with 0launch and keep the ones with 0.40.0. Did you get it the > right way round? Make sure you did and stop X and start it again. Have > you got a /usr/local/sbin/rox-session? I didn't think you should have > because ordinarily ROX-Lib can't create it on Ubuntu. If you have got > such a file, edit out the 0launch lines as above in that too. > > If it still doesn't work, run "ps ax | grep ROX-Session" again. If > the output still includes a long line with .cache/0install it confirms > something is still running the 0install version, otherwise you've got > some other problem. > > If the 0install version is running run "ps ax -O ppid,user" and post the > output here, then hopefully I'll be able to trace the parentage back to > whatever's running 0launch. > What do you know. There is, indeed a rox-session script in /usr/local/sbin. :-o |