|
From: Ken H. <ke...@ha...> - 2006-12-09 16:58:13
|
Thomas Leonard wrote: > On 12/7/06, Barry Kauler <bk...@go...> wrote: >> Hi, I'm the lead developer of Puppy Linux. Puppy has used ROX-Filer >> version 1.2.2 for the last couple of years, but I finally decided to >> upgrade, to v2.5. > [...] >> ROX 1.2.2 leaves smaller images as-is. But there doesn't seem to be any >> setting in 2.5 for this, so I was wondering, is there something that I >> can easily change in the source code to achieve this? > > It seems the behaviour changed here: > > r3716 | tal197 | 2004-11-11 14:04:24 +0000 (Thu, 11 Nov 2004) | 2 lines > > Much faster thumbnail generation (Ken Hayber, reported by Anthony DiSante). Oh sure, go ahead and blame me. ;) > I suspect this was unintentional, and we should never scale up when > writing thumbnails (whether we choose to scale them up for display or > not). I seem to remember some discussion about size, but don't remember the conclusion. > In fact, the spec says: > > "If a program needs a thumbnail for an image file which is smaller > than 128x128 pixel it doesn't need to save it at all." Makes sense to me. |