From: Thomas L. <ta...@gm...> - 2006-03-04 18:18:16
|
On 3/4/06, Ken Hayber <ke...@ha...> wrote: > Thomas Leonard wrote: [...] > > I think you're right. This is becoming unmanagable. Would anyone seriou= sly > > object if I removed D-BUS support completely for the next version? > > > Well, we also have to think about the Configlets. Can you make > a ROX-Settings module (Tony H's settings.py?) that can be switched > between xxmlrpc and some future theoretically stable dbus? Attached is one that works with xxmlrpc. It exposes the same interface as the D-BUS one to config applets. This is from LookAndFeel. Some applet have added extra functions to their copies, so dropping it over the top might not work without a bit of merging. We should move this stuff to ROX-Lib anyway. -- Dr Thomas Leonard=09=09http://rox.sourceforge.net GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 |