Re: [rox-devel] Re: SystemTrayN 0.3.1

[Ken H. <ke...@ha...>]

Ken Hayber wrote:
> Stephen Watson wrote:
> 
>> Ken Hayber <ke...@ha...> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> Stephen Watson wrote:
>>> 
>>>> SystemTrayN 0.3.1 (notification area applet) has been released.
>>>> 
<snip>
>>> Can't we please have an option that indicates whether
>> 0launch should be used or
>>> not?  At least make the local install higher priority over 0launch or ask
>> before just downloading or
>> 
>>> something?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I thought that was what the local feed was for.
> 
> 
> The way I see it is that a local feed is asking me to provide support for something that I don't
> use, in order to keep using something that has been working just fine for me.
> 
> Furthermore, in your configure script, it uses 0launch to find ROX-CLib, and when it fails, it
> then uses my local version just fine (I patched and built it after my first email).  But it does
> this after downloading the 0install version.
> 
> All I want is for it to check for the local version first - which apparently works since it
> eventually did use mine after failing to use the 0install version.
> 
> All I'm asking is to make this priority/order standard (local, 0install).

Patch attached.  All it does is check for the local install first, then does the 0install thingy.