From: Tristan A. M. <the...@gm...> - 2005-08-04 11:05:45
|
On 04/08/05, Lars Hansson <la...@un...> wrote: > On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 00:33:35 +0200 > Jonatan Liljedahl <th...@ho...> wrote: > > I still think it was better in the old days, when non-available buttons > > simply where left out. Guido, what about just leaving the area with the > > disabled button transparent? e.g. fill up the space but don't draw any > > button. >=20 > Why show anything for non-available buttons at all? If a button is not > available it's not really of interest to the user in the first place. Those Aqua-esque themes that use the same image for all buttons need them to stay in a consistent place, otherwise you don't know what's what. I also find it a little jarring to have window buttons move around, but seeing as I use a theme with icons on the buttons, it's not much of a problem. -- Alexander. |