Re: [rox-users] News

[Peter <sw...@ho...>]

On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:41:28 +0000, Liam Proven wrote:


snip...
>
> Oh come /on./ I would not have said anything at all if I hadn't tried it.
>
> I've been running ROX on Ubuntu. Since the desktop (ROX-Session) is
> not in the Ubuntu repositories, I have to install it from the ROX
> website-provided versions. This means using 0install, which means that
> I get Oroborox whether I want it or not.
>
> I've tried installing (say) Metacity (I have tried others, too) and
> then installing ROX. If I don't choose Oroborox, I get no WM
> whatsoever. If I accept Oroborox, it replaces whatever wm I had
> running.
>
> Kindly do not mock those whom you manifestly know nothing about.
>
The problem is the installation script of the packager, not ROX.

Either install it on your own in ~ or work around it as Ken suggested. Yours
is a case of improper use not lack of functionality.

As for mocking, did you not see :)?

--
Peter