From: Thomas L. <ta...@ec...> - 2006-01-17 20:20:11
|
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:07:48 -0200, Jonatan Liljedahl wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:13:17 +0000 > Thomas Leonard <ta...@ec...> wrote: > >> On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 14:31:47 -0200, Jonatan Liljedahl wrote: [...] >> > I've used OroboROX from the start and am very happy with our current >> > version. I don't have any problems with it at all. Is there anyone who >> > have had any problems with the latest version (0.9.7.9)? >> >> It looks like it has the same problem as 0.9.7.7: the findrox.py scripts >> are all out-of-date. >> >> Also, the OroboROX.xml file I wrote for that version could be included. >> >> See: >> >> http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/rox/OroboROX-tal-1.patch?download >> >> (although that patch includes some other changes you might not want to >> apply as well) > > Yes, it breaks if you're not running 0install. Please let the core rox > components (at least) be usable without 0install! =) Yes, don't apply those bits ;-) PS: I still need the source for 0.9.7.7. If it can't be found, we will have to stop distributing the binary, as the GPL requires us to provide the source too. Surely someone must have a copy? -- Dr Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 |