From: Keith W. <kr...@va...> - 2005-10-27 18:51:26
|
* <st...@ke...> [27/10/2005 1324EDT]: > Keith Warno <kr...@va...> wrote: >=20 > >=20 > > Correction, for clarity: It is not ignored *all the time*. :) Seems to > > be ignored for file types that shouldn't normally be executable (how > > many of you have an executable JPEG?). Honesty I think this is lame. > > If an execute bit is set, regardless of file name, it should be honored > > and I agree w/ Brandin on this. ROX-Filer should not be going out of > > its way to fix a mount flaw. >=20 > I've already argued this with Thomas, see > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.desktop.rox.devel/7241 and the replie= s. Doh. Yeah that sheds some light on things. Was hoping some other people would chime in on this. :) --=20 SA Valaran Corp GPG: 0xEC705AE9 I put the sh in IT. s/^\(I\)\(T\)$/\1sh\2/ |