From: Thomas L. <ta...@ec...> - 2003-06-19 11:01:06
|
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 09:37:43AM -0400, Matthew Weier OPhinney wrote: > -- Thomas Leonard <ta...@ec...> wrote > (on Monday, 16 June 2003, 12:10 PM +0100): > > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 02:33:20PM +0100, Geoff Youngs wrote: > > > Just a small patch to allow remote commands to be sent to ROX-Session. > > > > I'm thinking of adding DBUS support to ROX-Session at some point. > > Probably that will provide a better communications system. At the moment, > > there's not much point in halt, reboot, logout or suspend since you can do > > all of them without ROX-Session. > > > > However, if we add confirmation of unsaved data on logout/shutdown then > > they become useful... > > Another issue with the halt and reboot options is on multi-user > systems... I know that *I* don't necessarily want the average user being > able to do either of those things with the central server! ROX-Session has no special abilities. If a user can shut the system down with ROX-session, they can do it without too. > I would be for removing them, or making the display of these items > optional. They already shade if no command is set (the default). > Further question: what are the goals for ROX-Session? Will you be trying > to set up a way for users to save and load sessions (including window > locations)? or simply a way to load programs at startup (already > implemented)? I wasn't going to do either of those, although other people can send patches. I just want confirmation of unsaved data on logout... -- Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net ta...@ec... ta...@us... GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 |