Re: [rox-devel] ROX-Filer 2.0.0!

[Marcin J. <ma...@hr...>]

Thomas Leonard wrote:
> ROX-Filer 2.0.0, the first release of the new stable series

> Changes since 1.2.0:

So from now we will have 2.0.x stable and 2.1.x development? Time to 
think how to rename packages.. 'rox' for stable branch is OK but how to 
name current development release?

1. It can be 'rox' but then I have to use two repositories (one with 
'stable' one with 'devel') and user will have to choose which version 
does he want but both will be 'rox' (so bugreport without version will 
be useless).

2. Use 'rox' for stable release and other name for 'devel' release. But 
how to name it? 'rox-devel' is bad name because it suggests rather 
includes and other devel stuff, 'rox-current' is like 'rox-snapshot' or 
even 'rox-cvs' - all suggests CVS versions not release.

3. Package only 'devel' branch - but some users want to use official 
'stable' rather then development...

What do You think about it?

-- 
APT: deb http://www.hrw.one.pl/apt/ sid/