Re: Fwd: Re: [Jackit-devel] [Fwd: [Rosegarden-user] low latency]

[Paul D. <pa...@li...>]

>>    finally, the
>>    point of documenting this is that JACK does *is not usable*
>>    without it.
>
>Then this is a rather annoying problem I'm afraid.

it most certainly is. if anyone can suggest a better solution of where
in the filesystem to put a set of FIFOs that will not induce
unnecessary fs writes, i/we'd welcome it.