From: Chris C. <ca...@al...> - 2001-12-22 14:14:21
|
Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > (BTW Chris, I haven't received this mail, did you reply privately ?) No, but since I was replying to Bownie, I probably sent it to both him and the list (because I'm lazy) so his copy will have got there quicker. SourceForge seems to be having the odd off- day lately, not that I can really tell most of the time because so is my own ISP's mail server. > Er, better look at that 2nd arg aptly named 'base' Mmm. Typical. I've realised one of the reasons I never seem to notice this stuff is that Qt's documentation is generated from comments in the .cpp files, not in the headers. Since my usual way of looking up things in the API is to go to the header file, I don't tend to notice the documentation. Not a problem for the KDE stuff of course, because their docs are in the headers. And of course I should have noticed the "base" parameter anyway, so perhaps this line of argument is flawed. Oh well, I've used strtol now. I'll change it iff I can be arsed. Chris |