From: D. M. M. <ros...@gm...> - 2013-01-10 10:21:14
|
>> Hmm, that's a bit disconcerting. (If you'll excuse the pun.) Why does >> such a small change require changing stuff in so many places? Hah, you won the last round, pointing out that it was stupid of me to blindly follow the track label code around and add the new parameter so it had to be initialized in the ctor. Score one for you, Mr. Smarty Pants. Now I get to win THIS round. It turns out we use a really basic input dialog to get the track label from the user, and there's just no way to extend that to incorporate a new field. There are various hacky things I could do to avoid writing a new dialog, but a new dialog is what we really need. Can we say snowball effect boys and girls? (I hope you take me picking at you in the good spirit with which I intend it. Obviously if I didn't think this idea was worth doing, or even if it was just more work than I was willing to do, I wouldn't bother. I've ignored more features requests than you can shake a stick at my friend.) -- D. Michael McIntyre |