From: david <gn...@ha...> - 2012-09-30 06:04:50
|
On 09/29/2012 11:11 AM, Abrolag wrote: > On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 04:26:03 -0400 > "D. Michael McIntyre"<ros...@gm...> wrote: >> Rosegarden has stretched the limits of what is possible quite a long >> way, but at the core, trying to do full featured notation on top of a >> sequencer is just nuts. That has to be why no commercial developer has >> ever tried it. It's a labor founded on twin pillars of love and not >> being wrapped too tight. > > Then I shall happily be nuts alongside Rosegarden. In spite of my occasional > gripes and grumbles I wouldn't want to be without it! Me, neither. I've tried some other notation editors, and they're poor sequencers. (And usually have problems playing back, too.) Rosegarden's the best! -- David gn...@ha... authenticity, honesty, community http://clanjones.org/david/ http://dancing-treefrog.deviantart.com/ |