From: Yves G. <yc....@wa...> - 2010-11-18 20:22:52
|
Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010 09:47:28, D. Michael McIntyre a écrit : > > This sounds like good news, but at the same time it has me worried about > the work Ian has in progress. > > I'd like to see you two settle on a common approach pretty soon, before > getting into too much detail work refining all of this out into a final set > of features. Probably I forgot to say I copied Ian's branch into mine before doing some modifications. I hope Ian will recognize his code still. > > Now how does this change what Ian is working on for his branch, where he is > thinking about introducing the ability to have linked segments take on > different transpositions? I'm not paying that much attention to how either > of your two approaches really works deep down, so I don't know if this is > easy to move back and forth, or something that's going to be very unique > to one approach other the other. There is only one approach: Ian's one. Mine never works. I only replace the hidden central reference segment Ian uses with one the visible segments already in the composition. Nothing should change about the transposition and other transformation possibilities. Yves |