From: Brett M. <idr...@gm...> - 2010-05-16 18:06:51
|
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Dieter Plaetinck <di...@pl...> wrote: > What do you guys think about stopping development > of one of the projects [under its own name], and moving its unique > features into the other application? We would get an application that > has ardours audio capabilities/looks, and high quality midi and > notation features. Why Ardour & Rosegarden specifically? Why not Ardour & QTractor? Or Rosegarden and non-daw? Or Open Octave MIDI and non-daw? Personally, I like having my audio editing and MIDI editing in two separate applications. While I am working on my MIDI composing, I can have the audio part out of the way. Then once I get my MIDI recorded into audio tracks, I can shut down the MIDI app and have it out of the way and concentrate on the audio. Leave the big, bloated all-in-one apps to the Windows people. Using Jack to integrate these apps obviates the need for everything to be in one big application. -- Brett ------------------------------------------------------------ "In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world." -- Jelaleddin Rumi |