From: D. M. M. <ros...@gm...> - 2009-04-20 18:25:36
|
> That's the root of all this most recent blather on the topic. I just > hadn't really done much to explain all the background reasoning behind it. I should point out that I'm also making assumptions about a 2009 release at all, and that is not a given either. The 09 seems a little more firm than the x though, so it doesn't annoy me as much. All of this would seem like a better idea if we could pick a target in advance and aim for it. We're going to release in October of 2009, and we're working on 09.10. The problem with that is that the only one of us I can count on to be here regularly is me, and while I have really stretched out in the last few months and gotten more code-related work than ever done, it is definitely not a question that if I only spent more time trying I could solve all of these problems and get all of this done myself. I wish that were true, because I hate waiting, but I really have no choice but to wait. Not being able to define either of those numbers, really, is just something that quite annoys me. Maybe I'm OCD or something, and if so, you probably are too, Mr. Pixel Opacity. -- D. Michael McIntyre |