From: Emanuel R. <xb...@gm...> - 2009-01-23 21:17:52
|
2009/1/23 D. Michael McIntyre <ros...@gm...>: > > 9.05.1 9.05.2 seems most sensible as far as that goes, for months where there > are fix follow-ups in quick succession. > Remember: The number is for the users too. Who's able to recall a number as 9.05.2 on the question: "Which Rosegarden version are you using ? " Why not equally use a sha1() of the release time ;-) |