From: Vince N. <vin...@gm...> - 2006-06-17 04:49:05
|
[sending you a direct copy, Chris, because of strange problems I've been having with bounces..] On 16/06/06, Chris Cannam <ca...@al...> wrote: > In other words, I would probably expect that if your range covers part of a > segment's repeating trail, the events in that repeating trail _are_ included > in the pasted selection; and I would probably expect that if you copy only > _part_ of a repeating segment or its trail and paste it, the pasted segment > is _not_ repeated, whereas if you copy _all_ of a repeating segment and paste > it, the pasted segment _is_ repeated. I thought about what I would expect to happen without reading your description above, and independently came to the same conclusion. So I think its the "right" thing to do. The segment should only retain its "repeating-ness" if it is copied in its entirety. Vince |