From: Chris C. <ca...@al...> - 2003-04-27 18:01:09
|
On Sunday 27 Apr 2003 5:50 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: > The patch was rejected again, but generated a thread, > with some final consensus: the shit you can see now. Sorry. I thought it was up to the client itself (the ALSA device driver or=20 synth or whatever) to assign the client and port names? Surely they=20 can't all have changed to some oddball scheme just because someone=20 suggested it? (What is the scheme for these names, anyway?) And while I'm at it, any idea why that SBLive client reports its=20 internal synth ports (according to Bownie) as having type 2,=20 MIDI_GENERIC? I had expected them to report at least as a synth=20 type. Chris |