Re: [Rosegarden-devel] A new subbranch to make converters a bit easier

[Guillaume L. <gla...@te...>]

On Sunday 08 December 2002 13:32, Paul wrote:

> I was thinking that it may be an idea to introduce a plug in system

Yikes. Not at this stage of development, and even later with caution.

> protocol. The advantage is that it would help those wanting to
> contribute not to really have to understand the lilypond files, and
> thereby be able to contribute converters much more rapidly

We have more or less informally planned to provide ways to extend RG through 
either a scripting language or DCOP or whatever, in ways similar to Gimp or 
Emacs, but at the mo

> While on the subject of CVS, can the webpages be removed from the main
> branch and offered as an additional module? Download times on 56k
> connections would be greatly increased and the tar ball wouldn't hit
> roughly 5Mb!

That wouldn't help, as far as I understand sforge makes tarballs of the whole 
tree, so even if the pages where in another module you'd still get them. Plus 
they represent only a fraction of the whole thing, even if they were taken 
out you probably wouldn't notice the difference.

-- 
					Guillaume.
					http://www.telegraph-road.org